Council finances in ‘dire straits’, with adult social care named top long-term pressure


Three quarters of authorities in England lack confidence in the sustainability of council finances, with adult social care being the top long-term pressure, a new survey has found.

The Local Government Finance Survey, published by the LGiU and the Municipal Journal (MJ), paints a picture of the financial struggle facing local authorities after years of public sector cuts and ongoing uncertainty about the future of the local government funding system.

As reported in AMP’s sister publication, Home Care Insight, Only 3% of councils are happy with the government’s progress on local finances and 74% say they do not feel confident in the sustainability of local government finance.

Story continues below

Nearly all councils (97%) plan to increase council tax this year, while 90% of councils with adult social care responsibilities plan to make use of the social care precept, which allows local authorities to increase their share of council tax by up to an extra 2%.

Adult social care was named as the top long-term pressure for council finances (37% of councils), followed by children’s services (21%) and housing and homelessness (15%).

Children’s services and education was named as the top immediate pressure for council finances (with 36% of councils placing it first), followed by adult social care (24%) and housing and homelessness (18%).

Adult social care remains a major concern for most councils. While there was some agreement that the government has made progress towards meeting immediate sector funding needs, 98% of councils said they are unhappy with the progress the government had made towards developing a long-term social care strategy.

Jonathan Carr-West, chief executive of LGiU, said: “The state of local government finances is dire. Eight years later and the message continues to be the same, a broken record. It is simply unacceptable that the government has let things get to this point. Councils deserve better as they work tirelessly, day in and day out, to deliver the best quality services for their residents.

“This isn’t local government asking for more money. This is about a fundamentally flawed system that has been broken for years and the government continually refusing to acknowledge or engage in a proper solution.

“Sticking plasters will not solve these critical issues. Our social care system is no longer on the edge, it’s fallen off the cliff. Our children’s services aren’t at breaking point, they’re broken. These are issues that cannot wait another year to be solved. That is why we look forward to working with the new Government to develop solutions in the weeks and months ahead.”

Tags : councilFundingsocial care
Alex Douglas

The author Alex Douglas

1 Comment

  1. Only my own opinion, but i think that care home owners should only be allowed to own ONE care home each. Owning more than one care home is pure greed. And it leaves less choice for other people wanting to buy a care home. There’s only so much care home residents can take of crappy quality meals, sitting in the communal rooms, seeing the same faces all day every day, and getting barked at by care staff. It becomes mentally draining. I live in a residential care home, so this is how I know. All of your birthdays, new years, and christmas, just aren’t worth much once you live in care, because the last thing you really want is to spend special days with the other care home residents and with the care staff. I’m not saying this to be horrible, but I make excuses to be out of the care home all day, because I want to spend special days of the year with my fiance, not at the boring care home where everyone is grumpy, which then affects my own mental wellbeing. I’m only thirty-eight. I can’t be expected to sacrifice my freedom of choice for the care home’s sake. Mentally unwell people shouldn’t live together in the same building. They set each other off and create arguments.

Leave a Response